CMA Study Group

 View Only
  • 1.  Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-22-2020 04:02 AM
    Dear Members 

    Please help me to explain the working of below question



    ------------------------------
    Shilpa Sinha
    Analyst
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-22-2020 04:21 AM
    ​Hi Shilpa,

    Please find below:-
    '000s

    Initial Investment     $ 6,000

    Cash inflows at the end of Year 1 - 
                  Probability    Cash Inflow    Amount
    Scenario 1  30%             2,000            600
                 S2  40%             4,000           1,600
                 S3  30%             6,000           1,800
    Total cash inflow at the end of Year 1 : 600+1600+1800 = 4000
    NPV = 4000 x .909 = 3,636

    Cash inflows at the end of Year 1 -
    Probability      Cash Inflow    Amount
    S1 30%*50%            0                    0
          30%*50%         4,000           600
    S2 40 %*25%         6,400           640
          40%*75%         3,200           960
    S3 30 %*40%         6,875           825
          30%*60%         5,000           900
    Total cash inflow at the end of Year 2 : 600+640+960+825+900 = 3925
    NPV = 4000 x .826 = 3242.05

    Project's NPV: Initial Investment - Discounted Cashflows for Yr1 & Yr2
    = (6000)+3636+3242.05 = 878.5

    ------------------------------
    Mary Mitzel Claire Susa
    Accountant
    Dubai
    United Arab Emirates
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-22-2020 06:14 AM
    Dear Mary,

    Thanks for the explanation. Actually there is part 2 in this question that I missed to post earlier. I have doubt about the below question
    Assume the company has a real option to abandon the project at the end of year 1 if the salvage value at that time is $3M and the desired rate of return remains 10% , what is the project's NPV?

    Correct ans being $1,200,550

    ------------------------------
    Shilpa Sinha
    Analyst
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-22-2020 07:02 AM
    ​Hi Shilpa,

    I actually read the explanation of the correct answer, which is below:-

    Answer (B) is correct. 
    If the cash flows at the end of Year 1 equal $2 million, the expected value of the Year 2 cash flows is only $2 million [(.5 × $0) + (.5 × $4 million)]. If the cash flows at the end of year 1 equal $4 million or $6 million, the expected value of the Year 2 cash flows equals $4 million [(.25 × $6.4 million) + (.75 × $3.2 million)] or $5.75 million [(.4 × $6.875 million) + (.6 × $5 million)], respectively. After discounting these expected values to the end of Year 1, the present values are $1,818,000 (.909 × $2 million) given a $2 million Year 1 cash flow, $3,636,000 (.909 × $4 million) given a $4 million Year 1 cash flow, and $5,226,750 (.909 × $5.75 million) given a $6 million Year 1 cash flow. Accordingly, the real option of abandonment is preferable if the Year 1 cash flow is $2 million. The $3 million salvage value exceeds the expected value of the Year 2 cash flows discounted to the end of Year 1 in this case only. If the real option of abandonment is exercised only when Year 1 cash flows equal $2 million, the expected value of the cash flows at the end of Year 1 is $4.9 million {[.3 × ($2 million + $3 million salvage)] + (.4 × $4 million) + (.3 × $6 million)}, and the present value of this amount is $4,454,100 (.909 × $4.9 million). The expected value of the cash flows at the end of Year 2 if the real option is exercised only when Year 1 cash flows equal $2 million is $3,325,000 (.3 × 1.0 × $0) + (.4 × .25 × $6.4 million) + (.4 × .75 × $3.2 million) + (.3 × .4 × $6.875 million) + (.3 × .6 × $5 million), and the present value of this amount is $2,746,450 (.826 × $3,325,000). Consequently, the NPV with an abandonment option is $1,200,550 ($4,454,100 + $2,746,450 – $6 million initial outlay). This amount is substantially greater than the NPV with no abandonment option.

    However, I actually find it rather confusing as well. Because if the project will be ceased then its means that there should no more cash flow in Yr 2, right?

    While checking the explanation again, I am not sure if I am correct but it mentioned"If the real option of abandonment is exercised only when Year 1 cash flows equal $2 million" .

    Since, only Scenario 1 has a lesser cash flow value than the salvage value, thus there is only 30% chance to abandon the project and only Scenario 1 was assumed to be abandoned. So 3M was added to the cash inflow of Scenario 1 for yr1 while its yr2 was zero.
    Scenario 2 and 3 was assumed the project will not be abandoned because it has a greater value that the salvage value and company will not decide to abandon the project if it less than the salvage value.

    Again, I am not 100% sure if my opinion is correct, if anyone has a better or correct explanation. Please give us your insight.

    Regards,
    Mary Mitzel




    ------------------------------
    Mary Mitzel Claire Susa
    Accountant
    Dubai
    United Arab Emirates
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-22-2020 01:29 PM
    Dear Mary,

    Thanks for the reply.  I have convinced my self with the same logic as you as mentioned in the answer provided. With the option to abandon, only scenario 1 will be abandoned and Scenario 1 and 2 will remain as it is to calculate CF for the project.

    ------------------------------
    Shilpa Sinha
    Analyst
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: Cash flow analysis

    Posted 02-24-2020 01:47 AM
    I'm so  sorry to tell you that,I can't answer  your  questions for  my pool english