CMA Study Group

 View Only
  • 1.  (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    Posted 06-09-2020 04:23 PM
    Hi,

    Reference to the question below. Why is  the depreciation of the sold asset being considered and adjusted to arrive at the after tax cash flow?
    Please respond and assist.

    Tressa


    Question ID: ICMA 1603.P2.069 (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    A company installed new equipment with a four-year useful life and no salvage value. The new equipment cost $600,000 and will generate pretax cash savings of $150,000 annually. Old equipment with a book value of $50,000 and a remaining life of two years was sold for $20,000 when the new equipment was purchased. The company uses straight-line depreciation and its effective income tax rate is 40%. The second year's relevant after-tax cash flow is

    • A. $150,000.
    • B. $110,000.
    • C. $140,000.correct
    • D. $90,000.

    Correct Answer Explanation for C:

    The second year's relevant after-tax cash flow is the after-tax operating cash savings plus the depreciation tax shield.

    The annual after-tax operating cash savings is $150,000 × (1 − 0.40), which equals $90,000.

    The depreciation tax shield for the second year is 40% of the difference between what the depreciation would have been on the old equipment, had it been kept, and the depreciation on the new equipment. The depreciation on the old equipment, had it been kept, would have been $50,000 ÷ 2 remaining years of life, or $25,000. The depreciation on the new equipment is $600,000 ÷ 4, or $150,000. The difference, or the incremental depreciation expense, is $125,000. The depreciation tax shield is 40% of $125,000, or $50,000.

    The second year's relevant after-tax cash flow is $90,000 + $50,000 = $140,000.







  • 2.  RE: (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    Posted 06-09-2020 08:05 PM
    Hello Tressa,

    Hope you are safe & doing well in Part-2 study,

    In this case study there are two main highlights:
    1. Old equipment with a remaining life of two years was sold when the new equipment was purchased.
    2. The incremental depreciation expense

    The first point highlights on the concept of "Opportunity Cost" because of choosing to purchase the new equipment (Second alternative), while there were availability to use the old equipment for (2) years more (First alternative).

    The second point highlights on the concept of "Incremental Cost" in decision making, which has been calculated by taking the difference between the tax shield of the new equipment's annual depreciation and the lost tax shield of old equipment's depreciation. (New alternative cost saving - Old alternative lost savings)

    Please review question No.7 CSO: 2E1b LOS: 2E1b (Page 334) in the exam support package 2020 for the same concept.

    Wish you best of luck, success, safe & healthy condition

    Kind regards

    ------------------------------
    Samer Ahmad, FMVA, SCA
    Kuwait
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    Posted 06-10-2020 06:13 AM
    ​Hi Tressa,

    If the company did not purchase the new equipment, it would have depreciation tax shield on the old equipment for two years. The old equipmemt was replaced, we should consider the incremental depreciation tax shield in the second year.

    ------------------------------
    Regards,
    Christine
    Manager
    China
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    Posted 06-10-2020 06:50 AM
    Dear Christine,

    Thanks for the assistance.

    Best Regards

    Tressa




    ------------------------------
    TRESSA JOHN
    Executive Officer
    Kuwait
    Kuwait
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: (Topic: Capital Budgeting Process)

    Posted 06-11-2020 03:41 AM
    Dear Christine,

    Thank you for the assistance.

    Best Regards,

    Tressa



    Sent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone.